Short Adaptation RS-14
When searching for a useful and you may good tool, not simply required for different communities and in addition where in actuality the proposed factor structure might be affirmed, a few significant needs were in interest. “The fresh RS-14 reveals the fresh new brevity, readability, and you will simple scoring which were recognized as essential qualities when choosing instruments for usage with adolescents” (Pritzker and you will Minter, 2014, p. 332). The fresh new RS-14 “will additionally give specifics of the latest trend and reputation off strength utilizing an available everywhere measure of resilience which in turn often enable reviews that have early in the day and you will coming look,” which “will give help evidence that it’s a beneficial psychometrically voice scale to evaluate individual strength within the a long time out of teenagers and you may teenagers” (Wagnild, 2009a; Pritzker and you will Minter, 2014).
The newest short variation RS-fourteen might have been looked at off its build and it is discovered one to results are not necessarily totally consistent
Shopping for alot more financial variation of your Resilience Size, coming down achievement go out, and you can creating far more specifically for play with that have young people, Wagnild (2009a) altered new RS-twenty-five to14 affairs. The latest brief “RS-14 measure includes 14 worry about-statement affairs measured along an excellent 7-part get level ranging from ‘1-strongly disagree’ so you’re able to ‘7-strongly agree.’ High score try an indicator regarding strength height. With regards to the people, scores are computed of https://datingranking.net/de/mexikanische-dating-sites/ the a summary out-of effect values for each items, thus permitting results so you can range between 14 in order to 98.” Results lower than 65 suggest lower strength; ranging from 65 and you may 81 reveal average strength; significantly more than 81 could well be interpreted just like the highest amounts of resilience (Wagnild and you can Younger, 1993; Wagnild, 2009b, 2014). (more…)